Loading...
 
ESA > Join & Share > HMA-T > ERGO PROGRESS 0809 INTECS
Print

ERGO PROGRESS 0809 INTECS

ERGO Progress September 2008: Intecs

Project Manager Assessment


The status of the project is nominal.

Key Problem List


  • None

Risk Table


ID Risk Title                          Severity Likelihood Risk Index Risk Domain Action and status
1      - - - - - -
2      - - - - - -



Deliverables List


The following documents have been delivered:

  • none

WP1000: Project Management


Activities performed
  • none.

Outcomes and results
  • none.

Problems and concerns
  • none.

Plans for next period
  • none




WP2100: Requirement definition


Activities performed
  • none.

Outcomes and results
  • none.

Problems and concerns
  • none.

Plans for next period
  • This WP has been completed




WP3100 Integration of the OMAR open source implementation in the SSE Toolbox


Activities performed
  • Collected EbRIM CSW interfaces schema set and started analysis of GML 3.2.1 usage (currently not linked to the OGC official schema set).
  • Created a first version (prototype) of the scripts for the Gateway service type. Found and analyzed an additional feature (out of requirement baseline) that could be added to simplify service providers work on this kind of development.
  • Analyzed ebRR API. The API provided by 4CT are for client side. Intecs need a set of API for theintegration on the server side. 4CT will provide a set of API which will be similar to the client API. 

Outcomes and results
  • none.

Problems and concerns
  • none.

Plans for next period
  • The EbRR component will be integrated in the Toolbox 




WP4100 Validation and Conformance testing


Activities performed
  • The solution implemented by Intecs for the Team Engine extension has been discussed with the OGC CTL team members. Their vision is different from the actual implementation. A new tag format has been agreed. Intecs has analysed the approach proposed. The solution is feasible but require the development from scratch of this functionality (the work done for the prototype cannot be reused). This issue has to be discussed with ESA to decide how to proceed. 
  • Created a test environment for gateway service type. Message validation and team Engine code check has been performed (using the current Team Engine SOAP extension).

Outcomes and results
  • none.

Problems and concerns
  • The Team Engine SOAp implementation is not compliant with the OGC expectations. Intecs has analysed the new solution. The implementation can be done with additional effort. Some descoping may be required (in ERGO or in the HMA-E project).

Plans for next period
  • none


Contributors to this page: Massimiliano Fanciulli

Toolbox Support .

Page last modified on Friday 31 of October 2008 09:59:18 CET by Massimiliano Fanciulli.

Category: HMA-T